Pendidikan yang menghukum Indonesia

🇵​​​​​🇪​​​​​🇳​​​​​🇩​​​​​🇮​​​​​🇩​​​​​🇮​​​​​🇰​​​​​🇦​​​​​🇳​​​​​ 🇾​​​​​🇦​​​​​🇳​​​​​🇬​​​​​ 🇲​​​​​🇪​​​​​🇳​​​​​🇬​​​​​🇭​​​​​🇺​​​​​🇰​​​​​🇺​​​​​🇲​​​​​ 🇩​​​​​🇮​​​​​ 🇮​​​​​🇳​​​​​🇩​​​​​🇴​​​​​🇳​​​​​🇪​​​​​🇸​​​​​🇮​​​​​🇦​​​​​

𝑫𝒊𝒕𝒖𝒍𝒊𝒔 𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒉: 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒇. 𝑹𝒉𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒅 𝑲𝒂𝒔𝒂𝒍𝒊 (𝑮𝒖𝒓𝒖 𝑩𝒆𝒔𝒂𝒓 𝑭𝑬 𝑼𝑰)


𝙻𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚑𝚞𝚗 𝚕𝚊𝚕𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚑 𝚜𝚎𝚔𝚘𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚒 𝙰𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊 𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚝. 𝙼𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑𝚗𝚢𝚊, 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝙸𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚜 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝙴 (𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎) 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚊, 𝚑𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝, 𝚋𝚊𝚐𝚞𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚔𝚊𝚕𝚒. 𝙿𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚕, 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚓𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚋𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝙰𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚞 𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚛 𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚊.


𝙺𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚖𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚑 𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚜. 𝙼𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚝 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊, 𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚋𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚔. 𝙻𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚊. 𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚒𝚔𝚒 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒, 𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚒 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚑.


𝚁𝚞𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚑𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝚋𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚔, 𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚍𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚓𝚒. 𝙰𝚍𝚊 𝚊𝚙𝚊? 𝙰𝚙𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒? 𝙱𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚑 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚕𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚑𝚊𝚗? 𝙺𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚞 𝚋𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚒 𝚜𝚊𝚓𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚑 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚒, 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚑𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚞𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚒.


𝚂𝚎𝚠𝚊𝚔𝚝𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚜, 𝚒𝚋𝚞 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚊𝚝.


"𝙼𝚊𝚊𝚏, 𝙱𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊?"

"𝙳𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊," 𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊.

𝙳𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚞𝚖.


𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚙𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚑 𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚔 𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚔 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚊𝚐𝚒 𝚑𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚙 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊. 𝙸𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚜𝚊𝚊𝚝 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚋𝚊𝚑 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚢𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚝.


"𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚒," 𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋 𝚒𝚋𝚞 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚑𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚝, 𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚔 𝚒𝚝𝚞. "𝙱𝚎𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚊 𝚔𝚊𝚕𝚒 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚞 𝚊𝚢𝚊𝚑-𝚒𝚋𝚞 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔

𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔 𝚍𝚒 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚒," 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚝𝚗𝚢𝚊.


"𝙳𝚒 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝙰𝚗𝚍𝚊, 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒. 𝙵𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚏𝚒 𝚔𝚊𝚖𝚒 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔 𝚍𝚒 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚒 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖, 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚓𝚞. 𝙴𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝!", 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚝𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊.


"𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚑 𝟸𝟶 𝚝𝚊𝚑𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚛. 𝚂𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚙 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚍𝚊-𝚋𝚎𝚍𝚊. 𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚒𝚝𝚞, 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚞 𝚝𝚒𝚋𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝙸𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚜, 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚗, 𝚒𝚗𝚒 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚢𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝," 𝚞𝚓𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚔 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝙸𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚜 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊.


𝙳𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚔𝚞𝚜𝚒 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊. 𝙺𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚝 𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊.


𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚑𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚢 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒 "𝙰", 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚔𝚝𝚘𝚛.


𝚂𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊, 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚞𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚒 𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚒𝚛 𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚔 𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚒 𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚛𝚘𝚙 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚙 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚖. 

𝙿𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚕, 𝚜𝚊𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚑 𝚞𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚍𝚘𝚔𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚒 𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚒, 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚠𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚑. 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚞𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚞𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚛-𝚋𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚙. 𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗, 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚞𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚝.


𝚂𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊, 𝚜𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚔𝚊𝚗. 𝙼𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚓𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚔𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚑𝚞 𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚢𝚊. 𝙼𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚔𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚔-𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚔 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐-𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊 𝚔𝚊𝚖𝚒 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚒.


𝚄𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚑 𝚙𝚞𝚓𝚊-𝚙𝚞𝚓𝚒, 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚑𝚠𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚔𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗

𝚔𝚎𝚔𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚑 𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚊𝚗.


𝙿𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚊𝚝 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒 𝚔𝚎 𝚃𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚑 𝙰𝚒𝚛, 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚔 𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚔𝚜𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗. 𝙿𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚛 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐, 𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝 "𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚗" 𝚖𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚞𝚍𝚞𝚔 𝚍𝚒 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚞 𝚞𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗.


***

𝙴𝚝𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊, 𝚜𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚊𝚗. 𝚃𝚊𝚙𝚒 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚒 𝚍𝚒 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚑 𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑-𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑, 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐, 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚙 𝚜𝚎𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗-𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒 𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚔 𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚊.


𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚒 𝚏𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚒 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛 𝚋𝚒𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚔𝚜𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒, 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚊𝚊𝚏, 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚠𝚒.


𝙼𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚔𝚊 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚔𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝, 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝. 𝙷𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚗 𝚋𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚐𝚊, 𝚔𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚑 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚞𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚞𝚗 𝚔𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚑𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝-𝚑𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚕.


𝙾𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚓𝚒 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚔𝚊𝚗. 𝙰𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚖 𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚛 𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚊𝚗.


𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚕 𝚋𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞-𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚍𝚒 𝙰𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔𝚗𝚢𝚊. 𝙻𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚒𝚔𝚒𝚛, 𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔-𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚒 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚜 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚢𝚊-𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚢𝚊 𝚒𝚕𝚖𝚒𝚊𝚑 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝, 𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝙷𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚑 𝙽𝚘𝚋𝚎𝚕. 𝙱𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚔𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚜, 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚔𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚕 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞-𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚔𝚞𝚊𝚝: 𝚢𝚊𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚔𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚗, 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚔.


𝙺𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒 𝚔𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚜, 𝚒𝚋𝚞 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊. "𝙹𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚛 𝚔𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔-𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚑 𝚓𝚊𝚞𝚑 𝚍𝚒 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚗," 𝚞𝚓𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚑 𝚔𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚑𝚊𝚗.


𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔-𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚒 𝙰𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚋𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚕.


𝙰𝚗𝚊𝚔-𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚞 𝚝𝚒𝚋𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚞𝚖𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚒 𝚔𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚗, 𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚑, 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚔𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚝 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚋𝚎𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊 𝚕𝚎𝚋𝚒𝚑 𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚜, 𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚒 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝. "𝚂𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝, 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚑-𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚑. 𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗 𝚂𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒."


𝙼𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚒𝚝𝚞, 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚒 𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚑 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚙 𝚔𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚗𝚢𝚊. 𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚔𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚑-𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚑 𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚘𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚔𝚝𝚒𝚏.


𝙳𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚑 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚊𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚗𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚒 𝙴 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒 𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚝 (𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚊), 𝚝𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙𝚒 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚠𝚊 "𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑". 𝙺𝚒𝚗𝚒, 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚝𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚍𝚊.


𝙱𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚑 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚔 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐-𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚞𝚝?


𝙱𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚖𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚑𝚒𝚕 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚒 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚑 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚞𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗: 𝚁𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚕, 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛 𝚔𝚊𝚙𝚞𝚛 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚞𝚜 𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚑 𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚞, 𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚙, 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚗𝚢𝚊.


𝙺𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚞 𝚔𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗: 𝙰𝚠𝚊𝚜...; 𝙺𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚞...; 𝙽𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒...; 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚓𝚊 𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚕𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚞𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚔𝚘𝚕𝚊𝚑.


𝚂𝚎𝚔𝚘𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚒𝚗  𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚕𝚎𝚋𝚒𝚑 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚗. 𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗, 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚋𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚏 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝.


𝚃𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚊𝚗-𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚞 𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚒𝚕𝚖𝚞 𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚔 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚔 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚜, 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚞𝚝 (𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚕) 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚗𝚢𝚊, 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚑.


𝚂𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚊 𝚒𝚝𝚞 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚍𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 (𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗) 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐-𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚢𝚊. 𝙳𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚔𝚒𝚊𝚗, 𝚔𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚑, 𝚝𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚗.


𝙰𝚍𝚊 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚔𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚋𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚑. 𝚃𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙𝚒, 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 "𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚑 𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛" 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊 𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 "𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚑 𝚋𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚑".


𝙼𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚊𝚗, 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚗.

Komentar Anda

أحدث أقدم